No analogous application of § 179a AktG to the limited partnership

In its ruling of 15 February 2022 (II ZR 235/20), the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) abandoned its previous case law according to which the legal concept of § 179a German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz – AktG) also applies to limited partnerships. § 179a AktG is not (any longer) analogously applicable to […]

Current reporting requirements in the transparency register and upcoming changes due to the EU money laundering regulation

As of 1 August 2021, the transparency register was restructured by the Transparency Register and Financial Information Act (Transparenz-Finanzinformationsgesetz Geldwäsche – TraFinG Gw). In this process, the so-called notification fiction for the reporting of beneficial owners of legal entities to the transparency register was abolished, which prompted numerous companies to make entries. The transitional periods […]

The tax reduction under § 34 para. 3 EStG – also used by an unlawful granting

In its ruling of 28 September 2021 (BFH VIII R 2/19), the Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof – BFH) decided that the tax reduction under § 34 para. 3 German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz – EStG) is also used in the event that it was granted unlawfully and without prior application. This result may seem surprising […]

Personal liability of the representative of a UG acting in legal relations

According to a recent ruling by the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) (ruling dated 13 January 2022, case no. III ZR 210/20), a representative acting in legal relations on behalf of an entrepreneurial company (Unternehmergesellschaft – UG) is personally liable on the basis of a prima facie case (Rechtsscheingesichtspunkten) pursuant to § 179 […]

ARBITRABILITY IV: ANOTHER CHAPTER ON THE ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES REGARDING PARTNERS‘ RESOLUTIONS IN PARTNERSHIPS

If a dispute arises between shareholders/partners about shareholders‘/partners‘ resolutions, there is often an interest in a quiet resolution outside the ordinary court proceedings. However, it is important for arbitration agreements between shareholders/partners to meet the legal requirements. These have been developed by the Federal Court of Justice in its decisions Arbitrability II and III. With […]

Update on employee co-determination rights within supervisory boards

If the number of employees employed by a company exceeds a certain threshold, the law provides for the establishment of a supervisory board co-determined by employees. In accordance with established case law, the number of employees is determined by taking into account past and future developments on the basis of reference periods of several months. […]