The Federal Court of Finance assed an interesting decision (file no. VIII R 13/15), regarding the decision of the BFH (file no. IX R 36/15) in Q4: Accordingly, the final default of a loan leads to a loss recognized for tax purposes which must be taken into account on income from capital assets. It can be assumed that this also applies to shareholder loans and a shareholder may even benefit from a higher tax recognition than with a consideration as subsequent acquisition costs.

The Federal Court of Justice [Bundesgerichtshof – BGH] commented on the admissibility of the furnishing of securities granted by companies in favor of their shareholders and on the so-called capital maintenance rules in AGs [Aktiengesellschaft – stock corporation] and GmbHs [Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung – limited liability companies]. Capital maintenance rules have an “indirect” effect […]

Compliance clauses are nowadays a standard component of many (framework) supply agreements between companies. When introducing these clauses into contract negotiations, they are often extremely one-sided and present a high risk for the clause addressee. The following article demonstrates approaches and arguments which can help to achieve a proper limitation of a compliance clause.

The Federal Court of Justice [Bundesgerichtshof – BGH] has consistently extended the analogous applicability of the provisions under corporate law to Limited Partnerships with Many Members of the Public as Limited Partners [Publikums-Personengesellschaften] (hereinafter “Publicly Held Partnership”). However, it has so far not been decided by the BGH, whether the special audit in accordance with […]

By its judgment of 11 July 2017 – IX R 36/15, the German Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) has fundamentally changed its jurisdiction regarding the clasification of equity-replacing financial aids of shareholders to their company as acquisition costs within the scope of section 17 of the German Income Tax Act (EStG). Financial aids are, for example, […]