The years of criticism of the case law of the 7th Senate of the Federal Labor Court [Bundesarbeitsgericht – BAG] by the Regional Labor Courts and the literature have shown their effect: On 6 June 2018, the Federal Constitutional Court [Bundesverfassungsgericht – BVerfG] overruled the BAG’s previous case law on the prohibition of pre-employment in the case of unfounded time limits, leaving legal uncertainty behind. The three-year limit developed and applied by the BAG contradicts the Constitution, according to the BVerfG.

If a limited liability company is transformed into a company constituted under Civil Law, the question arises, whether it is required to enter the GbR and its shareholders into the commercial register. In practice, such entries have continuously been made, however, the Federal Court of Justice has now negated the necessity of entry. In the same case, it also had to decide on the liability consequences arising from a possibly incorrect entry that had been made.

The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that when determining insolvency, the liabilities (Liabilities II) that fall due within the three-week period after the reporting date must also be taken into account. Furthermore, the decision specifies the considerable evidence and presentation requirements for managing directors of a limited liability company who is being claimed by the insolvency administrator because of the initiation of payments after insolvency maturity.

According to the unanimous view in the literature on the AÜG, provisions under the AÜG are not applicable to managing directors. The Higher Social Court of Berlin-Brandenburg recently ruled that managing directors are subject to a statutory pension insurance due to an unauthorized temporary employment in accordance with the AÜG. Therefore, the question arises, whether and to what extent an employment of a managing director can nonetheless be affected by the AÜG.

By order of 19 January 2017 (file reference: VII ZR 112/14), the Federal Court of Justice [Bundesgerichtshof – BGH] declared a private company limited by shares sued in Germany which was removed from the companies register in England (foundation state) incapable of being a party to proceedings. The order also gives occasion to analyze the […]