The placement of orders via digital platforms in the form of so-called crowdworking serves to outsource (mostly) small-scale activities to a large number of people who are mostly unknown to the client – the “crowd” – whereby the orders are (frequently) placed via the operator of an online platform. The modern digital structuring of work (inevitably) leads to questions arising about the legal status of those involved in it. In the context of crowdworking, the status of crowdworkers as self-employed or employees had not been clarified until now. The Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht – BAG) has now ruled in a judgment dated 1 December 2020 that a crowdworker in the case to be decided was not self-employed but had to be classified as an employee (case no.: 9 AZR 102/20).
https://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.png00Ester Hahnhttps://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.pngEster Hahn2021-03-30 07:00:002021-03-30 07:00:21RULING OF THE FEDERAL LABOR COURT: CROWDWORKERS ARE – UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES – EMPLOYEES
https://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.png00Ester Hahnhttps://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.pngEster Hahn2021-03-08 12:48:452021-03-08 12:48:49honert advises Santo Group on the sale of the Sidroga Group
https://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.png00Ester Hahnhttps://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.pngEster Hahn2021-02-02 09:11:042021-02-02 09:11:07honert advises Bogner on the sale of its Munich headquarters
https://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.png00Ester Hahnhttps://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.pngEster Hahn2021-01-12 11:36:342021-01-12 11:36:37honert advises Fröhlich Holding GmbH & Co. KG on the sale of Fröhlich International Investment GmbH to TKW Molding GmbH
Provisions in the articles of association that allow for exclusion of a co-shareholder from the company without objective reason are generally immoral and therefore null and void. Under certain conditions, the Federal Court of Justice makes an exception to this principle for so-called management models. On this basis, the corporate participation of managers has become a popular incentive tool – now the Munich Higher Regional Court is pointing out limits with its decision of 13 May 2020.
https://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.png00Ester Hahnhttps://honert.de/wp-content/uploads/honert_logo_270px.pngEster Hahn2020-12-22 06:50:032020-12-22 08:36:26MANAGER OR INVESTOR? ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ANTICIPATED RETRANSFER OF SHARES AFTER THE END OF A MANAGING DIRECTOR’S OFFICE
RULING OF THE FEDERAL LABOR COURT: CROWDWORKERS ARE – UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES – EMPLOYEES
/in 2021 Q1/by Ester HahnThe placement of orders via digital platforms in the form of so-called crowdworking serves to outsource (mostly) small-scale activities to a large number of people who are mostly unknown to the client – the “crowd” – whereby the orders are (frequently) placed via the operator of an online platform. The modern digital structuring of work (inevitably) leads to questions arising about the legal status of those involved in it. In the context of crowdworking, the status of crowdworkers as self-employed or employees had not been clarified until now. The Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht – BAG) has now ruled in a judgment dated 1 December 2020 that a crowdworker in the case to be decided was not self-employed but had to be classified as an employee (case no.: 9 AZR 102/20).
honert advises Munich-based FinTech finway on seed financing round
/in Deal Announcements/by Ester Hahnhonert advises Santo Group on the sale of the Sidroga Group
/in Deal Announcements/by Ester Hahnhonert advises Bogner on the sale of its Munich headquarters
/in Deal Announcements/by Ester Hahnhonert advises Fröhlich Holding GmbH & Co. KG on the sale of Fröhlich International Investment GmbH to TKW Molding GmbH
/in Deal Announcements/by Ester HahnMANAGER OR INVESTOR? ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ANTICIPATED RETRANSFER OF SHARES AFTER THE END OF A MANAGING DIRECTOR’S OFFICE
/in 2020 Q4/by Ester HahnProvisions in the articles of association that allow for exclusion of a co-shareholder from the company without objective reason are generally immoral and therefore null and void. Under certain conditions, the Federal Court of Justice makes an exception to this principle for so-called management models. On this basis, the corporate participation of managers has become a popular incentive tool – now the Munich Higher Regional Court is pointing out limits with its decision of 13 May 2020.